BELLEVUE, Wash. – Ah, college kids and food.

Even when they raise their voices about pressing political or social issues, their thoughts quickly return to their stomachs.

MORE NEWS: From Classroom to Consulate Chef: Culinary Student Lands Dream Job at U.S. Embassy in Paris

The situation at Bellevue College in Washington State is a perfect example.

Students at the college are upset because administrators waited months to inform them about “hate speech” that was supposedly painted around campus, targeting Muslim or LGBTQ students, according to King 5.

So they formed an organization called “Bellevue Students United” and sent a letter to college administrators titled “Bellevue College Students United, DEMANDS.”

“This is a living document to acknowledge student and employee unresolved grievances with discrimination, racism, oppression and differential treatment,” the first sentence said.

And guess what showed up on that list of demands?

“Provide affordable pricing on all food offerings on campus,” the college kids demanded. “Eliminate profit margin on all foods provided by the cafeteria. Provide campus low-cost full lunch packs that include water, fruits, vegetables and sandwiches.”

It’s not clear how campus food prices, or the lack of pre-prepared lunch packs, have anything to do with “unresolved grievances with discrimination, racism, oppression and differential treatment.”

MORE NEWS: Know These Before Moving From Cyprus To The UK

But at least the kids didn’t demand free potato chips or pizza. They clearly understand the importance of fruits and vegetables.

To be fair, their list started out with two demands that at least addressed their topic. The grammar was a little mangled in both, but their points were more-or-less clear:

“Direct Communication of all Safety & Security Issues: Transparent two-way flow of channels from board to students specifically for hate crimes.”

“All students of targeted hate speech must be informed to the student body immediately and the school’s response and decided action in a timely manner.”

Many of the other demands were either very brazen, unrealistic, or again veered far from the stated topic:

“There shall be appropriate numbers of Public Safety Officers and patrols as decided by students in consultation with Public Safety officers.”

Are the students going to pay the extra officers they decide to hire, or cover the cost of overtime if they work longer hours? Will they be angry when that cost is reflected in higher tuition rates?

“Allow Muslim students access to a specific room(s) for daily and Friday prayers. Muslim students shall be provided and allowed to have items relating to prayers.”

Does the term “shall be provided” mean the college would have to purchase and give “items related to prayer” to Muslim students? Does the college purchase and supply Bibles to Christian students?

Wouldn’t such gifts violate the constitutional separation of church and state?

Faculty labor concerns also found their way onto the student list – somehow.

“A living wage and equitable pay for all staff and faculty, including adjuncts, with a progress reports showing BC meeting this goal.”

“…Stop using the threat of not granting tenure as a tool of coercion.”

Perhaps angry professors “guided” the students while they were developing their list.

Of course progressive political issues were also addressed on the list. This is a college campus, after all.

“Direct our state lobbyists to change the laws requiring investment in private prisons before and during the next legislative session.”

Someone should inform the kids that lobbyists have no power to change laws. And what do private prisons have to do with hate graffiti on campus, anyway?

Maybe they’re known for serving bad food.